1.中付支付合法吗

致订立了关于GPU销售的买卖合同，雷以企业的名义向G先生发出形式发票，指示G先生向一串数码形成的地址支付与美元等价的USDT，G先生支付后，雷并没有按照合同约定三天内发货，而是以各种借口拖延了两个月，G无奈之下找到律师请求帮助。

2.中付支付合法吗安全吗

Last week, Jingshi Shenzhen Lawyer  received a consultation from Mr. G from Italy about the international sale of goods. He met Mr. Lei from a Chinese company online through the Facebook platform. Through WeChat communication, the two parties reached an agreement on the sale of GPUs. issued a pro forma invoice to Mr. G in the name of Mr. G, instructing Mr. G to pay USDT equivalent to US dollars to a string of digitally formed addresses. After Mr. G paid, Lei did not deliver the goods within three days as agreed in the contract, but delayed using various excuses. After two months, G had no choice but to find a lawyer for help.

3.中付支付是干嘛的

G先生向我们提供了以下材料：一份没有签字盖章的形式发票，上面有。

4.中付支付是什么

在无法确定对方身份的情况下，在中国提起诉讼是非常困难的，即使通过法院的调查令取得雷的身份信息，案件得以在法院起诉，那USDT的支付方式是否可以在中国法院得到支持，在中国目前的司法实践中，对虚拟货币如何认定存在争议。

5.中付支付app可靠吗

双方沟通一致采取虚拟货币支付的方式来当作货款已经成为绕不过的法律问题。

6.中付支付是一个什么平台

虚拟货币的性质在中国法律上如何认定，而在中国的司法实践中又如何处理相关的问题，我们有必要在此进行探讨The gentleman provided us with the following materials: a pro forma invoice without signature and seal, with the information of the goods, the amount of the payment and the USDT address instructed to pay, as well as Leis contact information; two photos of Lei and his WeChat address. G couldnt even provide Rays real name, let alone his identity. We tried to contact Lei with the pro forma invoice address, but the phone couldnt get through, nor did the WeChat address. When the identity of the other party cannot be determined, it is very difficult to file a lawsuit in China. Even if Lei’s identity information is obtained through the court’s investigation order and the case can be prosecuted in the court, whether the USDT payment method can be supported by the Chinese court? In Chinas current judicial practice, there is controversy over how virtual currencies are identified. In the well-known complex international environment, international trade payment has become the focus of disputes, and the closure of PayPals Chinese customer accounts in the previous period also attracted attention. In some international goods transactions, it has become an unavoidable legal issue for buyers and sellers to communicate and agree to adopt virtual currency payment as payment for goods. How to determine the nature of virtual currency in Chinese law, and how to deal with related issues in Chinas judicial practice, it is necessary for us to discuss here.

7.中付支付官网

首先，2013年12月份中国人民银行发布的《关于防范比特币风险的通知》其中，对比特币的属性进行定义时提到：“从性质上看，比特币应当是一种特定的虚拟商品，不具有与货币等同的法律地位，不能且不应作为货币在市场上流通使用。

8.中付支付平台

”其它虚拟货币性质比照比特币，虚拟货币不具有流通属性，禁止虚拟货币参与非法金融活动，但法律并未禁止所有以虚拟货币为标的的交易活动根据北京仲裁委最新的仲裁裁决中的观点，仲裁庭认为：包括本案的比特币在内的虚拟货币属于虚拟财产，受到法律的保护。

9.中付

虚拟货币可以看作是一种虚拟财产受到法律的保护First, the "Notice on Preventing Bitcoin Risks" issued by the Peoples Bank of China in December 2013. Among them, when defining the attributes of Bitcoin, it is mentioned: "In nature, Bitcoin should be a specific virtual commodity, which does not have the same legal status as currency, and cannot and should not be used as currency in the market. .” The nature of other virtual currencies is comparable to Bitcoin, virtual currencies do not have circulation properties, and virtual currencies are prohibited from participating in illegal financial activities, but the law does not prohibit all trading activities with virtual currencies as the target. According to the opinion in the latest arbitral award of the Beijing Arbitration Commission, the arbitral tribunal believes that the virtual currency, including the bitcoin in this case, is virtual property and is protected by law. Virtual currency can be regarded as a virtual property protected by law.

10.中付支付什么意思

但在实践中，涉及虚拟货币纠纷的案件属于新兴领域纠纷，全国各类法院和仲裁机构的判决思路存在较大差异，“同案不同判”现象在司法实践中屡见不鲜，但整体来看，目前对相关案件的诉求不予以支持、判定合同非法无效、各自承担损失的审判占主流。

北京、上海有多家法院认可比特币等虚拟货币具有虚拟财产的属性，而更多的地方中级人民法院则对除比特币以外的虚拟货币的财产属性不予认可另一方面，与虚拟货币的相关案件面临取证难、司法程序处置难等困境，由于虚拟货币的技术属性，在案件处理中会涉及信息壁垒、域外取证及认定标准不统一等；对虚拟财产任何进行冻结、如何处理等都是实践问题，使得即使有了生效的判决，如果强制执行返还也是问题。

However, in practice, cases involving virtual currency disputes belong to emerging fields. There are great differences in the judgment ideas of various courts and arbitration institutions across the country. The phenomenon of "different judgments in the same case" is not uncommon in judicial practice. The appeals of the relevant cases are not supported, and the judgment of the contract is illegal and invalid, and the trial that each bears the loss is the mainstream. Many courts in Beijing and Shanghai recognize that virtual currencies such as bitcoin have the attributes of virtual property, while more local intermediate peoples courts do not recognize the property attributes of virtual currencies other than bitcoin. On the other hand, cases related to virtual currency face difficulties such as difficulty in obtaining evidence and difficult judicial procedures. Due to the technical nature of virtual currency, information barriers, extraterritorial evidence collection and inconsistent identification standards will be involved in the case handling; Freezing, how to deal with it, etc. are all practical issues, so even if there is an effective judgment, it is a problem if the return is enforced.

以全国首例涉比特币的仲裁裁决撤销案件【（2018）粤03民特719号】为例：2017年12月2日，当事人签署的一份协议中规定，高某要分三期将李某委托其进行理财的数字货币资产（20.13个比特币、50个比特币现金、12.66个比特币钻石）全部归还至李某的电子钱包。

结果，该协议签订后，高某未履行合同义务李某遂根据协议中的仲裁条款向深圳仲裁委员会申请仲裁，提出要高某归还上述数字货币资产相等价值的美金和利息等诉求仲裁庭经审理认为，高某未依照案涉合同的约定交付双方共同约定并视为有财产意义的比特币等，构成违约，应予赔偿。

但高某宇随后诉至深圳市中级人民法院，请求深圳中院撤销上述仲裁裁决，深圳市中级人民法院以仲裁裁决违背公共利益撤销了仲裁裁决，意味着李某就比特币的相关利益并未实际得到支持Take the country’s first case of revocation of an arbitration award involving Bitcoin [(2018) Yue 03 Minte No. 719] as an example: On December 2, 2017, an agreement signed by the parties stipulated that Gao would remove Li in three phases. All the digital currency assets (20.13 bitcoins, 50 bitcoin cash, 12.66 bitcoin diamonds) entrusted to him for financial management were returned to Lis e-wallet. As a result, after the agreement was signed, Gao failed to perform his contractual obligations. Li then applied for arbitration to the Shenzhen Arbitration Commission according to the arbitration clause in the agreement, claiming that Gao should return the US dollars and interest equivalent to the above-mentioned digital currency assets. After hearing, the arbitral tribunal held that Gao’s failure to deliver the bitcoins, etc., which were mutually agreed upon by both parties and deemed to have property significance, constituted a breach of contract and should be compensated. However, Gao Mouyu then sued the Shenzhen Intermediate Peoples Court, requesting the Shenzhen Intermediate Court to revoke the above-mentioned arbitral award. The Shenzhen Intermediate Peoples Court cancelled the arbitral award because the arbitral award violated the public interest, which means that Li has no interest in Bitcoin. actually supported.

那么是否可以认为，在中国不能使用虚拟货币呢？也不尽然，目前司法实践中法院对大数据、虚拟财产的保护秉持较为积极、开放的态度，即只要这些数据、虚拟财产是企业通过合法、正当的经营活动取得且未损害他人合法权益，法院一般会承认企业由此获得的商业利益并予以保护。

免费申请POS机，费率低至0.38%秒到账

2021年2月在上海宝山区人民法院关于比特币纠纷的一起案例判决中，法院就判决被告向原告返还一个比特币，最终案件在执行过程中达成和解，被执行人最终以人民币84000元的价格折价赔偿给申请执行人回到文章初始我们提到的咨询内容，G先生为了获取合法的货物，支付了相应对价的USDT， 应该得到法律的保护。

So can it be considered that virtual currency cannot be used in China？It is not always the case. At present, in judicial practice, the courts hold a more positive and open attitude towards the protection of big data and virtual property, that is, as long as these data and virtual property are obtained by enterprises through If the legal and legitimate business activities are obtained without harming the legitimate rights and interests of others, the court will generally recognize and protect the commercial interests obtained by the enterprise. In February 2021, in a case judgment on a bitcoin dispute by the Shanghai Baoshan District Peoples Court, the court ruled that the defendant should return one bitcoin to the plaintiff, and the final case was settled during the execution process, and the person subject to execution finally settled the price of RMB 84,000. compensation to the applicant. Returning to the consultation content we mentioned at the beginning of the article, Mr. G paid the corresponding consideration in USDT in order to obtain legal goods, which should be protected by law.

进出口法律事务部主任赵宝莲律师对海外的买家提出以下的建议：In order to better ensure the safety of international trade transactions,lawyer

Zhao Baolian,director of the import and export legal affairs department,makes the following suggestions

to overseas buyers:1、你要清楚你的交易对手是谁，如果是公司的话，要求提供公司的营业执照，如果是个人的话，要求提供身份证的复印件，这些都不是过分的要求1、 You need to know who your counterparty is, if it is a company, ask for the business license of the company, if it is an individual, ask for a copy of the ID card, these are not excessive requirements.。

2、海外买家在没有平台保障的情况下，与交易方签署合同是必要的，如果合同相对方是公司的话，请签署合同并加盖公司的印章，中国企业正式的合同要有公司签章并法定代表人签字，签字要用中文姓名2. It is necessary for overseas buyers to sign a contract with the transaction party if there is no platform guarantee. If the counterparty to the contract is a company, please sign the contract and affix the companys seal. The official contract of a Chinese enterprise must be signed by the company. And the signature of the legal representative, the signature must be in Chinese.。

3、如果双方协商一定要虚拟货币支付，请接收方在提供支付地址同时确认这个账户归属方，并锁定支付的价格，这样在发生争议时有返款的依据3. If the two parties must negotiate to pay in virtual currency, please confirm the owner of the account while providing the payment address, and lock the price of payment, so that there is a basis for refund in the event of a dispute.。

当然，安全的交易模式依然是保证签署合同的相对方，形式发票的签发方，支付账户的接收方，这些信息应当一致，中英文与公司注册信息相符；支付方式以货币交易或者信用证交易；大宗物品要做相应的合同相对方背景调查等，最大程度地保证交易安全。

Of course, the safe transaction mode is still to ensure that the counterparty who signed the contract, the issuer of the proforma invoice, and the recipient of the payment account, these information should be consistent, and the Chinese and English should be consistent with the company registration information.

赵宝莲律45@126.com。

Lylian ZhaoDirector of Import and Export Legal Affairs Department of Beijing Jingsh (Shenzhen) Law Firm, Master of Law. The main professional direction is foreign-related litigation and arbitration, foreign investment and domestic enterprises foreign investment legal affairs, and foreign trade legal support.

点分享

点在看